TTH's main problems seem to be that he does basically worship the GB / JW Org / Watchtower, and therefore will not have anything bad said against those things, even if the criticism is constructive and true.
This is so silly. It is so infantile.
Every project needs leadership. Once you grant persons that leadership, you refrain from undercutting them at every step. Why in the world should that be so hard to understand?
You don’t set 15 rows back and swipe at the bus driver, “you missed that turn, you could have avoided that pothole, you hit the brakes too hard, why didn’t you know there was a roadblock ahead? Why didn’t you know that jerk was going to cut you off?” You know that the roads are poorly maintained, that the route is unfamiliar, and that the weather is terrible.”
There are any number of things I am not crazy about with regard to the theocratic organization. If you read with any sort of critical skills you would know that. That does not mean if when I appear on a forum where the majority seek its destruction and level one attack on it after another, I will say “you know, you’ve raise a good point there.”
So Tom, did you grant the GB leadership ?
Yes. When I signed on many years ago. They didn’t sneak up out of nowhere. Their role was known to me and everyone else from Day 1.
My personal opinion is that the GB are not that 'Jew' . So i haven't 'granted those persons that leadership'.
That is why you are not a Witness. Everything is exactly as it should be. Given how you feel, you have done exactly as you should.
Maybe you should consider what exactly a person is taught when they start having a 'Bible study' with JW's.
Yes. Every Witness takes about a year to do that, studying and trying things on for size. Throughout, they are in their familiar home environment and routine. Perhaps 5% of their time is spent in unfamiliar surroundings.
College is far more “manipulative” than anything with a Witness connection. Students are typically separated 24/7 from their former stabilizing routine, environment, and family—a classic tool of those who would brainwash. Plus, if you study with Jehovah’s Witnesses, you know full well that you are going off the grid—the very opposite of what brainwashers do. Going to college, on the other hand, is no more controversial than seeking good healthcare.
Many of the books that have been used as study books are now long gone and would cause embarrassment to 'modern day' JW's. The GB hide this by saying they have 'new light'.
You keep playing this as though it were your trump card, the coup de grace—as though it was something meant to be hidden. They are very open about it. They have called it “tacking.” As you say, they have called it “new light.” Don’t you think that means there used to be “old light?”
So whereas you may like to say I have mental illness and am infantile
Not usually. Maybe never. I said that your last bit of reasoning was infantile. I said that because it was. I didn’t say you were.
Similarly, I did not say that you were mentally ill. I have said that any mental health professional would say that the type of thinking that you were displaying at the moment (most typically “all or nothing” thinking) is unhealthy. That is not the same thing.
You also have to realize that I do not regard mentally ill as a pejorative label, and more than I would regard diabetic as one.
Will you ever say on here, “you know, you’ve raise a good point there.”
Not everything that you say is silly. I have acknowledged that some points you have raised are valid. Not always to your face, because you are such a pit bull. But I have put them in other writings.