Can One Prove the Faith?
The Sins of Some Men are Publicly Known, Leading Directly to Judgment, but Those of Other Men Become Evident Later  

Whitepebble’s Smart-Alec Kid Disses Faith

Willie Whitepebble, Wayne’s boy, graduated from university with a degree—not one of those ‘so what?’ degrees to which you say, ‘Sorry for not having a PhD in the hogwash your PhD is in’—No, he graduated with a real degree in a bona fide discipline: philosophy. Thereupon, he started dissing faith.

Since science shows humans are but the tiniest speck on a planet of the most insignificant star, and not the very center of the universe, so much for man-centric-religion,’ he said.

Straw man argument, anyone? There may be churchy types that carry on as though the central theme of the universe is our personal salvation, but that’s on them. It is nothing the Bible advances.

The Bible has man at the center of the universe, does it? How did this one escape his attention:

When I see your heavens, the works of your fingers, The moon and the stars that you have prepared, What is mortal man that you keep him in mind, And a son of man that you take care of him?

No boasting about human importance there. ‘Dust on the scales,’ the psalmist calls them: The sons of men are a mere breath, The sons of mankind are a delusion.  When laid together on the scales, they are lighter than a mere breath.” (Psalm 62:9)

So if science disproves faith, it certainly does not do so on the basis that it gave people of faith a rude awakening, as though they imagined themself the center of everything and now they can no longer do so.

Willie came up with another straw man: Science shows how chaotic are the subatomic building blocks of life, therefore belief in God is nonsense—as though men of faith have always figured Lego blocks were the starting point.

Why doesn’t he just go with Job 26:14?

Look! These are just the fringes of his ways; Only a faint whisper has been heard of him!

No expectation of simplicity there, is there?

If Willie disses faith, as appears his Mission now, he must do it with arguments that apply, not with straw man arguments that don’t.

He must not confuse church with Bible. Often they are different. And he must not confuse church with Jehovah’s Witnesses. Often they too are different. Does church put humans at the very center? Often they do. Witnesses don’t.

And if the early ‘science’ of Aristotle that came to be favored by the early Church—drawn to it because it was knowledge by decree, rather that observation, that doesn’t mean the Bible favored that ‘science.’ There is Aristotle, pasting on the heavenly bodies on the canopy surrounding central earth. He may do it. The Bible does not do so.

He stretches out the northern sky over empty space, suspending the earth upon nothing,” says Job 26:7

I used to attempt to hang my pen upon nothing, to illustrate how unlikely it was for ‘primitive’ man to envision Job’s words on his own. Very carefully I would hang it there, before letting go. Always it would fall. But that was when I carried a pen. Nowadays all is digital and so I am stymied.

All this is not to say that Willie’s college may not serve him well. It well might, at least in the short term. His stint at the optician’s office was cut abruptly short when he proved himself not too observant about sign placement.


(Photo: anonymous on social media. If it’s yours, claim it)


******  The bookstore


Defending Jehovah’s Witnesses with style from attacks... in Russia, with the book ‘I Don’t Know Why We Persecute Jehovah’s Witnesses—Searching for the Why’ (free).... and in the West, with the book, 'In the Last of the Last Days: Faith in the Age of Dysfunction'



is Scott Adams "the old pork chop"?
Whoever he -"the old pork chop"- is, I've been really worried lately that I might have said things that made him more truth- Org -resistant. which would be terrible ! IMO.

not to mention dumb , of both of us. [but when I speak dumb, I am speaking my native language, whereas i think he is being needlessly dumb, if he let my rude, mean behavior-which i regret v. much, btw- mislead him away from what is ,i.m.o., very much The Truth.
IF -somehow- that ever somehow happened, somehow?]
The correctness [again, I.n M.y [deservedly-H.umble ] O.pinion] of J.W. chronology is one thing that seems to me to stand out in the end of 2 Kings, And 1 Chronicles 1 mentions Ashkenaz, which is what got me on this research kick wherein the name ,Adams came up 4 me-again, i.e., not for the 1st time. anyway, sorry to ramble so much/so nonsensically - pcll › family › adams
Clan Adams | 64 Tartan products: Kilts, Scarves, Fabrics & more | CLAN ...
The Adamsons, through their kinship with both Clan Mackintosh and Clan Gordon, were also at the forefront of Scotland's cause during the prolonged and bloody Wars of Independence against the nation's more powerful enemy, England. &
Images for dress gordon tartan scott "adams"

Just hoping you read before deleting, if deleting.

[Ans: Nope, Scott is not the old pork chop. All such names derive from people I know in real life, more commonly a combination of people, and once in a while I just make them up.

Too bad about speaking rashly, if you did. If you feel bad you can always append a ‘Sorry, not really appropriate what I said/ not my place/ etc. I got carried away.’ So rare is it for people to receive an sincere apology that it can go a long way.

It is hard to get their attention, in any event. Just sending a tweet his way does not mean he read it. If you regret something you said, well—who hasn’t been there?

The comments to this entry are closed.